After excoriating Republicans for shutting down the government in 2013, leading Democrats now appear willing to do the exact same thing unless they get amnesty for 800,000 DACA recipients.
Republicans have offered to make a deal. Their terms were once supported by Democrats, CPI’s Rachel Bovard writes in The Hill. Read the full op-ed here.
Ironically, these were once terms that many Democrats supported. Indeed, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), currently leading the charge for Democrat DACA demands, formerly sponsored bills increasing immigration enforcement on the border, and in 2006, voted for a border wall.
Schumer wasn’t alone. In 2006, he was joined by 25 additional Senate Democrats in voting for a border wall, including Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Barack Obama(D-Ill.), Joe Biden (D-Del.), and Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.).
The 2006 bill authorized “two layers of reinforced fencing and installation of additional physical barriers” to ports of entry along the southern border. In 2013, the bill sponsored by Schumer authorized an additional 700 miles of fencing and technology along the U.S.-Mexico border, and devoted $40 billion a decade to strengthen enforcement along the border.
All these policies sound suspiciously like what President Trump is asking for.
So, why do congressional Democrats oppose these measures now?
Democrats, in a large part, have been captured by the radical left-wing activists of their party, who are demanding nothing less than full amnesty for DACA recipients. As Vox’s Dara Lind writes, “Democrats have come to defer to organized immigration activists in a way they didn’t 10 years ago, or even during the early years of the Obama administration … the party has moved substantially to the left on the issue of immigration enforcement.”
Center for American Progress President Jennifer Palmieri, who served as aide both to Hillary Clinton and President Obama, released a memo stating that congressional Democrats must “refuse” to vote for “Republican spending bills that do not offer a fix” for DACA recipients.
Angela Padilla, policy director for the liberal group Indivisible, took it further in saying “a vote for any spending bill on Jan. 19 is a vote to deport the dreamers.”
As another left-wing activist put it, the progressive immigration movement is “laser-focused on Jan. 19 as a do-or-die moment.”
“No wall, nope,” Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) told reporters last week, adding that “spending billions and billions of dollars on this wall because of a political promise and a campaign promise is ridiculous.”
These positions leave no room for compromise on DACA. For Democratic activists, it is all or nothing.
Unfortunately, recent high-profile news stories have highlighted the dangers of the policies the activist Democrat base is promoting. The shooting of Kate Steinle by a repeat offender who was protected by San Francisco’s sanctuary city policy made national headlines. Two recent terrorist attacks in New York — the Manhattan truck attack on Halloween and the failed suicide bombing attempt at the Port Authority — both involved attackers who benefited from liberal immigration policies.
Nevertheless, the liberal wing of the Democrat party is assigning amnesty as a definitional moment for Democrats. One liberal opinion blogger threw down the gauntlet: “It’s long past time for Democrats in Congress to abandon the old rules of political civility.”